data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cd11/5cd1180264c0eca0804f50b77f2124805c731ba0" alt="Lead and copper rule revisions"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8283e/8283e53b74e04dd520d17d6e9e3db0010d324744" alt="lead and copper rule revisions lead and copper rule revisions"
Systems are required to prepare and update a publicly-available inventory of lead service lines and “find-and-fix” sources of lead when a sample in a home exceeds the Action Level of 15 ppb.Under the old Lead and Copper Rule, there was no requirement to replace lead service lines unless the System detected lead at the current Action Level of 15 ppb.Īdditional new requirements in the LCRR include: If a System identifies water at the Trigger Level of 10 ppb, it is required to, among other requirements, (1) either conduct a corrosion control study (if it does not currently treat for corrosion) or re-optimize its existing corrosion treatment system, and (2) work with the State to set an annual goal for replacing lead service lines. The LCRR maintains the current MCLG and Action Level, but introduces a lead Trigger Level of 10 ppb. The original Lead and Copper Rule established a Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (“MCLG”) of zero lead in drinking water, and an Action Level of 15 parts per billion (“ppb”). The Trump-era LCRR was the largest change to the Lead and Copper Rule since the rule was promulgated in 1991 and has the most significant impact on Large Community Water Systems (“Systems”), which are water systems serving more than 10,000 customers. Under the authority of the Safe Drinking Water Act, the purpose of the Lead and Copper Rule is to protect public health by minimizing lead and copper levels in drinking water, mainly by reducing water corrosivity because lead and copper enter drinking water primarily from corrosion of lead and copper in plumbing materials.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/504af/504afdcf787784e21f5b0394e59c2130daaf6fd1" alt="lead and copper rule revisions lead and copper rule revisions"
The Lead and Copper Rule Revisions (“LCRR”) On January 6, 2022, the states filed their opening brief, explaining that they wanted the court to vacate the recent EPA actions, which were, in their view, unlawful delays of the compliance deadlines in the LCRR. Circuit Court of Appeals, in the case of Arizona et al. In response to the delays of the LCRR’s effective date and compliance deadlines, the states of Arizona, Louisiana, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Texas filed a challenge in the D.C. Review of the National Primary Drinking Water Regulation: Lead and Copper Rule Revisions (LCRR), 86 FR 71574 (Dec. Then, in conjunction with the LCRR’s effective date, on December 16, 2021, EPA announced its plans to revise and strengthen the LCRR, while leaving the rule in place for now. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Lead and Copper Rule Revisions Delay of Effective and Compliance Dates, 86 FR 31939 (June 16, 2021).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72aa2/72aa2ec3e13f276813713e5411f710e491ddb3db" alt="lead and copper rule revisions lead and copper rule revisions"
As it grappled with what to do with the LCRR, the Biden EPA delayed the LCRR’s effective date and compliance deadlines on two occasions, most recently making the LCRR effective on Decemand pushing the compliance deadline back nine months, from Januto October 16, 2024. One focus of the current EPA has been the Lead and Copper Drinking Water Rule Revisions (“LCRR”), promulgated under the Trump administration. EPA faces continuing pressure to improve the way it protects communities from lead in drinking water.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cd11/5cd1180264c0eca0804f50b77f2124805c731ba0" alt="Lead and copper rule revisions"